As a progressive hero, what I detest the most is when so-called "liberal" or "progressive" entrepreneurs are so prone to suck it up to certified dictators, opressors and world bullies just to make another fistful of dollars. Zuckerberg pulls a Google: you know you can't make your big entrance to China without licking the boots of a few chi-coms, getting a politically debilitating wedgie, and granting that you won't interfere in any way with their iron-fist rule and you will be sure your precious social network will keep it that way.
jueves, 23 de diciembre de 2010
You don't get to 1300 million chinese people without compromising your principles
miércoles, 22 de diciembre de 2010
Net Neutrality: The end of the Internet as we know it?
Just like any given extremist, there's a personalized pick for you if you want to use the power of the FCC it you want to shut down something you don't like: some want to axe Fox News, others want a thorough investigation of the lastest season's Dancing with the Stars voting system, and others... well, they just want to take over the world, i.e. the Internet.
Congratulations! The first "net neutrality" regulations have been adopted by the FCC, but I don't blame them. Everybody is busy nowadays shutting down what they don't like of the Internet. Hugo Chávez, Julian Assange, the chinese (didn't you know there's no Facebook in China?). In the meanwhile, I let some expert give you some details:
Congratulations! The first "net neutrality" regulations have been adopted by the FCC, but I don't blame them. Everybody is busy nowadays shutting down what they don't like of the Internet. Hugo Chávez, Julian Assange, the chinese (didn't you know there's no Facebook in China?). In the meanwhile, I let some expert give you some details:
Related articles
- FCC Regulators Impose Net Neutrality - What is it? (techie-buzz.com)
- U.S. Fails to Offer Convincing Net Neutrality Policy (descentintodarkness.wordpress.com)
- FCC Net Neutrality Vote Sets Up Legal Challenges (informationweek.com)
- Wingnut Blogs Go Cuckoo Over Net Neutrality Bill (littlegreenfootballs.com)
- Will Net Neutrality Save the Glorious System of Tubes? Or Just Make it a Little (Lot?) Crappier? (reason.com)
sábado, 18 de diciembre de 2010
Colombian mining policy: spread your legs, relax and enjoy
A rough and rude title, but anyone who has read Introduction to the Colombian Economy by Alvaro Tirado Mejía, could hardly disagree, or would at least be wanting to sugarcoat reality. Two examples: the history of the Colombian Mining Company and Francisco Antonio Zea (they are very tied toghether). The other, I have to quote it as friend told me years ago: Two companies, A (private entrepreneurship) and B (state ownership), decided to start a partnership to for a promising business. To determine if the projections provided were viable and profitable enough, the private company went all the way and so they decided to get to work. The "A" company has about 6,000 employees. and the "B" company has about 50. Revenues from each one of every sale were divided in half and half strictly. Costs were too. Although the projections of A were not met, investment in infrastructure was so massive that there were no choice but to move forward. After a few years of operation, B was on the verge of bankruptcy, with huge losses and had to be liquidated. A, were as good as ever. How could that be possible?
Any acute reader will have noticed that I was telling (secondhand) the story of Intercor (A) and Carbocol (B), which despite being equally in all, ended with the state company bearing all rthe losses of the of the Cerrejon business. Now it's just history, but over two hundred years, the story remains the same: a timid and weak government that only knows how to say yes to predatory companies with true pirate vocation. On the other hand, how is it possible that in two hundred years it has not changed the mining business way? Why it did not change in two hundred years what we like to name corporate culture?
Not having to be progressive to be interested in this, but anyone who feels this like a personal injury, I know that the interests of the nation have been damaged in a not mensurable way and it is still hurting! Cristina de la Torre puts the nail on the head, in his column in El Espectador as she denounced Ingeominas, and in general how the previous administration refused to exercise control over mining operators who exploit our mines, something truly unprecedented and that could be considered rightfully as treason. This is not to kick to the investing companies out, but to simply state that they are unfair to us. They have to comply to what they have promised before. None of pacta sunt servanda sic rentibus sic other technicalities. It seems they are not satisfied with such tremendous advantages (tax stability agreements that that the majority of entrepreneurs in the country do not have), must be also not accountable to her partner, the Colombian State. What a shame!
Colombia's mining policy has not changed in two hundred years: it is simply spread her legs, relax and enjoy (?).
Any acute reader will have noticed that I was telling (secondhand) the story of Intercor (A) and Carbocol (B), which despite being equally in all, ended with the state company bearing all rthe losses of the of the Cerrejon business. Now it's just history, but over two hundred years, the story remains the same: a timid and weak government that only knows how to say yes to predatory companies with true pirate vocation. On the other hand, how is it possible that in two hundred years it has not changed the mining business way? Why it did not change in two hundred years what we like to name corporate culture?
Not having to be progressive to be interested in this, but anyone who feels this like a personal injury, I know that the interests of the nation have been damaged in a not mensurable way and it is still hurting! Cristina de la Torre puts the nail on the head, in his column in El Espectador as she denounced Ingeominas, and in general how the previous administration refused to exercise control over mining operators who exploit our mines, something truly unprecedented and that could be considered rightfully as treason. This is not to kick to the investing companies out, but to simply state that they are unfair to us. They have to comply to what they have promised before. None of pacta sunt servanda sic rentibus sic other technicalities. It seems they are not satisfied with such tremendous advantages (tax stability agreements that that the majority of entrepreneurs in the country do not have), must be also not accountable to her partner, the Colombian State. What a shame!
Colombia's mining policy has not changed in two hundred years: it is simply spread her legs, relax and enjoy (?).
Related articles
- Drummond Said to Mull Sale to Private-Equity Firms (businessweek.com)
- Glencore, Xstrata Eye Drummond's Colombian Coal Assets, FT Says (businessweek.com)
- You: On Colombian minefields, rats may become man's best friends (latimes.com)
- US court indicts Dutch Farc rebel (bbc.co.uk)
- CEMEX Announces Land Donation to Colombian Park Service (eon.businesswire.com)
- UPDATE 3-Colombia's Cerrejon eyes 40 mln T in coal output (reuters.com)
Etiquetas:
Business,
Cerrejón,
Colombia,
El Espectador,
Francisco Antonio Zea,
Mining
jueves, 16 de diciembre de 2010
Is Wikileaks imploding?
The reason couldn't be other than Julian Assange gigantic ego. I feel so good what I know about American duplicity diplomacy now, but the guy, even if he's facing persecution, should have hired a PR hack to handle the heat he's facing right now. Obviously, he does not like to how his intimate and private details are given away (leaked) to the public. But a clerical error, a major mistake is not to keep your employees happy, as it seems by now. Even some of them are getting fed up of seeing how Assange takes full credit for everything. Now the founder of Wikileaks faces this:
Now irony is looping the loop, and the leaker is being leaked.
Related articles
- WikiLeaks leaked: Former spokesman set to blow whistle on secret-spilling website with tell-all book (dailymail.co.uk)
- Julian Assange: WikiLeaks Prepared to Make Major Bank Exec Resign (blippitt.com)
- Julian Assange interview (redantliberationarmy.wordpress.com)
- Watch: Al Jazeera Interviews Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange (towleroad.com)
- Julian Assange Claims Wikileaks 'Affiliates' Have Been 'Assassinated' (littlegreenfootballs.com)
viernes, 10 de diciembre de 2010
This former president is completely bat-guano insane
I've found out power is sort of a make-up kit. When you have it, no matter how angry, stupid, inconsequential or belligerent you act, you can still look sorta cool. One of the perks of being the alpha male. When you don't, you're just a screaming, pathetic nobody. Have you ever seen in a crowded meeting some mature man past his prime trying to grab all the attention and still trying to be relevant? You force a little smile and try to walk away backwards, slowly, very slowly...
That's not true, either. This erratic, aggressive and mean behavior has been Uribe's trademark for his entire life. At the beginning, he had the youth, then he got the power. Now that he's an ex president, he really looks pathetic and lame when he attempts with a strange and out of order furor to defend his presidency and his former aides from all the attacks, political and judicial, received in the last couple of months.
Taking the novelty of his Twitter account aside (which he couldn't understand how to handle at the beginning, witness the gaffe of trying to issue a lengthy press release this way), Uribe has incurred in so many contradictions, the biggest of them all was to claim there was no possibility of a fair trial for his former aides regarding the colossal wiretapping scandal that marked the end of his presidency.
In fact, it was a multi-gaffe. First, he uttered this whopper outside Colombia, something he vehemently condemned when his political adversaries did the very same thing during his tenure. Second, after tirelessly insisting in how things worked out in his presidency, now that every Colombian could travel across the country without the fear of being kidnapped, and how the overall security substantially improved, it was a curious paradox how things were different a mere few months after his appointed successor, Juan Manuel Santos, took the oath as the new Colombian president. Well, it is not a secret that his heir apparent, Andrés Felipe Arias, couldn't make it past the primaries. Otherwise, things could have been really different (and to his satisfaction). And third: he's right. There's no reasonable way to figure there could be a fair trial, because his former employees waged a war against the judiciary, the first and foremost victim of the wiretapping scandal. That means they brought all this unto themselves (Maybe it was intended as such, since victims cannot judge the offenders).
And now, Uribe faces the inconvenience of Wikileaks. The leaked Department of States cables are beginning to produce a steady embarrassment to him. For starters, his no-nonsense, no-concessions approach to the war against the guerillas has been shattered: it was revealed he was looking for secret peace talks. Besides, everybody knows Hugo Chávez, the Venezuelan president is an authoritarian, not a democrat. But it sounds kind of awkward when Uribe, according to the cables, uses a very non-diplomatic language to assert that Chávez is a Hitler and the Venezuelan situation is akin to the Third Reich Germany. Like Uribe himself were the madman.
And now, Yidis Medina, a congresswoman found guilty of receiving bribes to vote the constitutional reform that allowed Uribe's re-election, says in her tell-all book, that the president begged her for her definitive vote... down in his knees in a rest room.
That does it, he's completely bat-guano insane.
Related articles
- Cables: Colombia's Uribe reached out to FARC (sfgate.com)
- Colombia: Uribe's Presidential Legacy Haunted by Scandals (time.com)
- Hugo Chávez breaks diplomatic ties between Venezuela and Colombia (guardian.co.uk)
- Colombia's foreign policy: Seeking new friends (economist.com)
- After the Fight: Hope for Colombia (time.com)
- Fearing the Chávez Model (american.com)
- Colombia Should Ditch U.S. 'Special Relationship': El Espectador, Colombia (themoderatevoice.com)
- Colombia spy chief asylum row (bbc.co.uk)
miércoles, 8 de diciembre de 2010
Treinta años sin John Lennon
Hace treinta años, John Lennon, una leyenda viva, el fundador y líder de la más grande banda del pop/rock de todos los tiempos (muérdete el codo, Lady Gaga), fue asesinado por un pesadillesco "fan" llamado Mark David Chapman (pudo haber hecho carrera como doble de Stephen King), justificándolo al decir que el Artista (sí, con mayúscula) era un farsante (al cantar "Imagina que no hay posesiones" y poseer una fortuna de unos 150 millones de dólares) y dejando entrever también su complejo de Eróstrato reclamado la vida de John para obtener su anhelada notoriedad instantánea.
El día de hoy han sido tratados ya todos los enfoques, así que me iré por el enfoque personal para comentar el aniversario de la muerte de John. Es cansón para todos salir a cantar una vez más todos las alabanzas bien conocidas y bien merecidas. Tampoco voy a empezar a señalar con el dedo y decirles lo terrible que era John como persona. Y es que es aún más fácil descartar todas las deficiencias de John cuando uno recuerda el tamaño y la cantidad de sus logros. Todos los Beatles me han decepcionado en un momento (Paul lo hizo recientemente en la Casa Blanca, tratando de insultar a Bush, terminó insultando a su esposa Laura), pero en mi calidad de beatlemaníaco furioso, estoy más que dispuesto a perdonar.
Por cierto, el carácter de Lennon estaba lleno de defectos horribles, pero eso no le impidió nunca querer y tratar de hacer lo correcto, y una vez más, debemos recordar que sólo unas pocas personas (por lo menos tres de sus compañeros) realmente podían entender cómo era volverse increíblemente famoso, con admiradores adorandote a ti, diciendo también que le era imposible equivocarse.
Whatever gets you thru the night, is alright, is alright.
Artículos relacionados (en inglés)
- John Lennon Quotes: Late Beatle Was 'Not Interested' in Being 'Dead Hero' (spinner.com)
- Huffington Post: John Lennon's Death: HuffPost Bloggers on the 30th Anniversary (huffingtonpost.com)
- John Lennon (1940 - 1980) (sandwalk.blogspot.com)
- Rolling Stone releases Lennon's final interview (omg.yahoo.com)
- John Lennon 30th Anniversary: Killed By Mark David Chapman In NYC (nowpublic.com)
Etiquetas:
Beatle,
Imagina,
john lennon,
Mark David Chapman,
New York City,
Yoko Ono
lunes, 29 de noviembre de 2010
Wikileaks: la verdad os hará libres
Aunque parezca mentira, la cita del Evangelio de Juan (Capítulo 8, vers. 32) es el eslogan de la CIA. Y qué mayor prueba de que al mundo lo gobierna la mentira que el escándalo que El Tiempo llama "Cablegate" y que la prensa estadounidense llama con el sitio web (que the sipmac ensemble linkeó desde hace meses) que desencadenó lo que promete ser un verdadero pandemonium: Wikileaks.
Los hechos: un insignificante soldado raso llamado Bradley Manning (huele a libro y a película, ¡sí señor!) filtró al website Wikileaks entre 250 y 400 mil comunicaciones del Departamento de Estado. Es como si alguien se hubiera hecho al diario de la confidente más chismosa del vecindario y de pronto todos supiéramos que piensa cada quién de cada cuál.
Wikileaks es propiedad de Julian Assange, un idealista con pinta de Walter Mercado para el que los secretos en el gobierno no deben existir como cuestion de principio. Él mismo está ahora prófugo de la justicia, acusado de acoso sexual y acceso carnal violento (más de uno piensa que le están empezando a girar las tuercas). El mismo website sufrió un ciberataque, pero Assange ya arregló con los principales periódicos del mundo (New York Times, El País, Le Monde) para la publicación de los mensajes.
Hay mucho material explosivo por destacar, yo me limito a resaltar por ahora la "racionalidad "que parece distinguir a la diplomacia mundial: Arabia Saudita, Qatar y los demás vecinos de Irán, están muy preocupados de ver como esta última nación está ad portas de convertirse en una potencia nuclear. Le piden a Estados Unidos que haga algo ya, que les saque las castañas del fuego. El gobierno estadounidense podría pedirle a Arabia Saudita que si bien ya está financiando en forma oficiosa a Al Qaeda, bien Osama bin Laden podría hacerle la tarea. Se dice que la administración Obama le vendió a Arabia Saudita unos 60 mil millones de dólares en armamento. ¿Cuánto iría a parar a Osama?
Para saber la parte de Latinoamérica, como siempre, habría que esperar un par de semanas.
¿Será que sabremos que hacer con tanta libertad?
Related articles
- Wikileaks 'attacked by hackers' (bbc.co.uk)
- WikiLeaks cables show U.S. government trying to make world safer (washingtontimes.com)
- WikiLeaks Under Cyber Attack Right Before Release of Secret Documents (alternet.org)
- Wikileaks' next target: the financial sector (shortformblog.com)
- "Assange could be charged under Espionage Act: report" and related posts (asianetindia.com)
- The Next Wikileaks Will Be About a Major Bank (gs, Ms, Bac) (businessinsider.com)
- Palin On Wikileaks, Ctd (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Rush Limbaugh on Wikileaks Julian Assange (pumabydesign001.wordpress.com)
Etiquetas:
Al Qaeda,
El País,
Julian Assange,
Le Monde,
New York Times,
Osama bin Laden,
Terrorism,
United States,
Walter Mercado,
Wikileaks
jueves, 18 de noviembre de 2010
Regresa Formoltv
The sipmac ensemble me encomendó pronunciarme a nombre de todos para celebrar el regreso de formoltv, cuyos colaboradores pudieron ganar la demanda que los obligó a cerrar temporalmente el blog. Como ya ha dicho Paul Maršić,
Felicitaciones a Kain y a Juliantintan por salir airosos de semejante incordio, y por haber ayudado a sentar un importante precedente jurídico que proteja la libertad de expresión en Internet.cosa con la que todos aquí estamos de acuerdo. Cuando me pongo a leer en la red inevitablemente me encuentro con cantidades de cosas que me escandalizan e indignan, pero hace tiempo comprendí que es a esos "provocadores" (desde mi subjetividad) a quien el derecho la libertad de expresión debe proteger. Pensemos por un momento en quienes no pueden disfrutar de ese derecho.
Felicitaciones de nuevo, Juliantintan y Kain Hellraiser.
Related articles
- Peru: Blogger Sentenced for Defamation of Former Politician (advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org)
Etiquetas:
formoltv,
libertad de expresión
lunes, 8 de noviembre de 2010
Olbermann Apologizes To Viewers, Strikes Back At MSNBC [UPDATE]
This reeks so of publicity stunt! A two-day suspension for making political donations? Again, as I said before, this does not make any sense. But if you consider the gallons of ink and pixels spent on Olbermann, well, there's not such a thing as bad publicity. GE/NBC/MSNBC still has a lot of 'splainin to do.
ON THE OTHER side, Olbermann's statement was a truly classy one. When he wrote: "I would also like to acknowledge with respect the many commentators and reporters, including those with whom my politics do not overlap, for their support", well, that made my day. Welcome back.
Related articles
- Keith Olbermann thanks Countdown viewers -- and challenges NBC (dailykos.com)
- Olbermann Apologizes To Viewers, Strikes Back At MSNBC (huffingtonpost.com)
- Olbermann Apologizes to Viewers, But Not to MSNBC (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com)
Etiquetas:
Campaign finance,
Keith Olbermann,
MSNBC,
NBC,
Politics,
Publicity stunt
domingo, 7 de noviembre de 2010
Keith Olbermann: "Greetings From Exile!"
This is a truly embarrassing one for GE/NBC/MSNBC: a contributor can rant and ramble his way 24/7 (making a living in the process), and support his ideology and party on the air, but it is a big no-no to contribute with money to their favorite candidates? Give me a break. Everybody knows where Olbermann's money is, as everybody knows the same about Hannity, Coulter, etc.
It has no logic, it does not make any sense. It's so obvious, even rightwingers say on this "huh?". If it were a ratings matter, why did not MSNBC said so? Again, did they think Olbermann's journalistic integrity was compromised by giving money to politicians? Would that make more of a "sock puppet" out of him?
It would have made more sense if he complained bitterly about GE/NBC/MSNBC on air.
Related articles
- Rachel Maddow Defends Fallen Colleague Keith Olbermann With Attack on Fox News (observer.com)
- Keith Olbermann Suspended From MSNBC (buzzfeed.com)
- Keith Olbermann's Suspension: Did MSNBC Overreact? (themoderatevoice.com)
- Olbermann Suspended For Not Giving On Air Apology? (lezgetreal.com)
- Politico: Olbermann Suspended for Refusing to Apologize (littlegreenfootballs.com)
martes, 2 de noviembre de 2010
Parents Are Biggest Obstacle To Pot Legalization: Survey
Got to get you into my life? |
"Caffeine kills something like 1500 people a year. Pot zero. Go figure."
"Drug-related crimes would drop"
Those are typical argument-ready sophisms for legalization, and two of the most despicable ones. You can do better if you want to support legalization. Otherwise, we should then use suspension of disbelief to accept that second-hand smoke can't kill anybody or you can't get contact-high. Following that reasoning, drinking could not alter perception while driving and couldn't cause any kind of accidents. It should be something else. Stupidity, maybe.
And organized crime won't dissappear the next day pot became legal. Thugs are going to find something else, even more unpleasant for John Q. Public.
Let's make an honest debate and abandon that old sophistry already.
I might have a lot of parent issues myself, but for once I want to think parents could really care about their children in this case.
Related articles
- "CA Voters Appear To Change Minds, Oppose Pot Legalization" and related posts (thecrimereport.org)
- What Will The Feds Do If California Legalizes Pot? Ctd (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Parents Are Biggest Obstacle To Pot Legalization: Survey (huffingtonpost.com)
- Op-Ed Columnist: End the War on Pot (nytimes.com)
Etiquetas:
California,
California Proposition 19,
Cannabis,
Crime,
Health,
Legality of cannabis,
Organized crime
miércoles, 27 de octubre de 2010
Reforma del sistema de salud: quiero protección, no sobreprotección
¡Cómetelo todo! |
“¡Tómate la mazamorra!” “¡Cepíllate los dientes!” “¡Cómete las verduras y el hígado!” “¡Deja de ver televisión y sal a jugar!” “¡Deja de estar tomando tanto todos los fines de semana!” “¡Apaga ese cigarrillo!” “¡Deja de comer tanta grasa!” Y no nos olvidemos del clásico “¡No te metas los dedos en la nariz!” En fin, tantas órdenes que hemos recibido en nuestras vidas para que nos cuidemos, al fin y al cabo es por nuestro propio bien.
Pues bien, ahora nuestro gobierno procura reformar el sistema de salud colombiano; que, como todos los sistemas, tiene más necesidades insatisfechas que cubiertas. Un sistema mixto, en el que estado regulaba y competía. Cuando la competencia le quedó grande, se dedicó a regular sin ton ni son (Por ejemplo, en nombre de la igualdad, la Corte Constitucional niveló los servicios de los planes de salud pagados y subsidiados, dejándole la minucia de la financiación al poder ejecutivo). Por no quedarse atrás, en el sector privado la competencia brilla por su ausencia, son más los servicios que niegan que los que aprueban (aunque los pague el FOSYGA), y los “dispensadores” de servicios, denominados rimbombantemente Entidades Promotoras de Salud (o EPS), actúan con total impunidad, condición inherente al oligopolio que existe en cuanto a EPS se refiere.
¡Cantemos! "Sooomos toodos saludaaaables" |
En un afán de mantener los costos abajo, el estado colombiano ha dado un sinnúmero de traspiés que dejan entrever la naturaleza totalitaria con la que se quiere manejar el tema de salud pública: una cosa es prohibirle a los fumadores darle rienda suelta a su vicio en cualquier parte (los demás pagamos al tener que financiar con nuestros aportes al fondo de solidaridad de salud, las consecuencias de su tabaquismo — sin mencionar el humo de segunda mano), y otra muy diferente es tratar de establecer una especie de manual de procedimientos para ejercer la medicina a través de las EPS, ¡y con sanciones ejemplarizantes al que se desvíe de la norma! ¡Era el estado colombiano, y no la comunidad médico – científica quien iba a determinar la práctica médica!
Camarada, deja de beber. ¡Es por tu propio bien! Así no le sirves al estado. |
Este despropósito fue perpetrado en las postrimerías del anterior gobierno. Por mucho que necesitemos de un marco legal y de la protección del estado para acceder a servicios que la mayoría de nosotros no podríamos pagar, este tipo de intentonas reguladoras nos lleva a extremos donde la responsabilidad personal y la libertad de elegir son completamente ahogadas bajo la presunción de que el estado debe y puede microrregular todos y cada uno de los aspectos de nuestras vidas.
Traje a colación los ejemplos anteriores porque, aunque haya cambio de gobierno, el estado no quiere dejar vivir a sus “súbditos”: el proyecto de ley estatutaria busca poner orden el sistema de salud, en su artículo 11 propone:
Deber de autocuidado de la salud. El autocuidado es el deber que tiene toda persona de procurar el cuidado integral de su salud y la de su familia. Toda persona debe procurar la atención integral de su salud. Los padres deberán procurar la atención integral a la salud de sus hijos menores de edad o mayores de edad en la situación de discapacidad. Los centros educativos y los actores del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud deberán adelantar actividades pedagógicas para enseñar a la población prácticas para el cuidado de su salud y la prevención de la enfermedad.
¡Sí! ¡Te vigilo a tí! |
¿Qué tal? Ni siquiera es un buen intento. Hablando del estado niñera, esto se pasa de la raya.¿O no? Cualquiera dirá que uno de los objetivos del estado es el de velar (o "propender") por la salud de sus habitantes y debe buscar estimular, más bien desestimular los hábitos destructivos de los usuarios del sistema. Bueno, el sector privado, a través de sus pólizas de seguros y medicina prepagada, había conseguido ya un mecanismo de desestímulo, pero no lo divulgaba, ni sabía venderlo, y si lo comunicaba, era automáticamente vilipendiado: el de las preexistencias.
La codicia corporativa es un desorden alimenticio
martes, 19 de octubre de 2010
La política minera colombiana: ábrete de piernas, relájate y disfruta
Un abismo de pérdidas |
Un título rudo y grosero, pero cualquiera que haya leído Introducción a la Economía Colombiana de Álvaro Tirado Mejía, difícilmente se mostrará en desacuerdo, o al menos con ganas de edulcorar la realidad. Para ejemplos, dos: la historia de la Colombian Mining Company y Francisco Antonio Zea. El otro, lo tengo que plantear tal como me lo contó un amigo hace unos años: Dos compañías; A (de capital privado) y B (estatal), deciden asociarse para iniciar un negocio promisorio. A suministra las proyecciones que determinan que el negocio es viable y rentable y deciden poner manos a la obra. A tiene unos 6.000 empleados. B tiene unos 50. Los ingresos por cada una de las ventas se reparten estictamente mitad y mitad. Los costos también. A pesar de que las proyecciones de A no se cumplen, la inversión en infraestructura es tan grande, que no queda más remedio que seguir adelante. Después de unos años de operaciones, B está al borde de la quiebra, con inmensas pérdidas y debe ser liquidada. A, sigue tan bien como siempre. ¿Cómo es posible esto?
Cualquier lector agudo se habrá dado cuenta de que se trataba de la historia de Intercor (A) y Carbocol (B), que a pesar de ir a partes iguales en todo, terminó la empresa estatal llevando la peor parte del negocio de El Cerrejón. Ahora sólo es historia, pero a lo largo de doscientos años, esa historia sigue siendo la misma: un gobierno timorato que sólo sabe decir que sí a empresas con auténtica vocación depredadora, digna de piratas. Por otro lado, ¿como es posible que en doscientos años no haya cambiado la forma de hacer negocios en minería? ¿Lo que ahora se llama cultura corporativa?
Hola, soy del Ingeominas y voy a a fiscalizar... |
No hay que ser progresista para tener interés en esto. A cualquiera que le duela el país, sabe que los intereses de la Nación se han perjudicado en forma incalculable y se siguen perjudicando. Cristina de la Torre pone el dedo en la llaga; en su columna de El Espectador denuncia como Ingeominas, y en general la anterior administración se rehusó a ejercer control sobre los operadores mineros que explotan nuestras riquezas, algo realmente inaudito y que se podría considerar como traición a la patria. No se trata de sacar a patadas a las empresas inversionistas, simplemente es verificar que no nos estén tumbando, tal como lo están haciendo. Que cumplan con lo pactado. Nada de pacta sunt servanda sic rentibus, ni otros tecnicismos. No conformes con tremendas ventajas (tipo contratos de estabilidad tributaria, que no tienen la mayor parte de empresarios del país), también tienen que recibir la gabela de no tener que rendir cuentas a su socio, el Estado Colombiano. ¡Qué vergüenza!
La Contraloría identificó cinco posibles detrimentos fiscales relacionados con la liquidación de regalías por la Drummond y Cerro Matoso, por un monto de 284 mil millones. Para explotar nuestro níquel recibió la primera beneficios tributarios por 920 mil millones entre 1995 y 2007. Por regalías, sólo pagó 283 mil millones en el mismo período. Si Cerro Matoso dejó de pagar 24 mil millones entre 2004 y 2008 por su explotación en Montelíbano, Córdoba, ya podrá inferirse cuánto se birló en los 21 años anteriores, desde 1982, cuando inició trabajos.
Bridging the Enthusiasm Gap: Obama and the Conventional Wisdom
"Soon after the New Year, perhaps as part of the State of the Union, Obama should announce that he favors an end to affirmative action as we know it. Instead of race based affirmative action, he is throwing the support of his administration behind the idea of economic-based affirmative action- -- and he might include his support for proposals that illustrate this new approach such as universal school vouchers based on family income (which Reich advocates in his book)."
That's something I would like to support. A more universal affirmative action, based on income: brilliant! I wish something like this would be taken into serious consideration by the Obama Administration, with a simple set of rules, not a 3,000 pages manuscript. Anyway, count me in.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
That's something I would like to support. A more universal affirmative action, based on income: brilliant! I wish something like this would be taken into serious consideration by the Obama Administration, with a simple set of rules, not a 3,000 pages manuscript. Anyway, count me in.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
jueves, 14 de octubre de 2010
Nos faltan agallas / We lack courage
Demasiado blando... |
El que sentencia una causa sin oír la parte opuesta, aunque sentencie lo justo es injusta esa sentencia.Una cita de Jorge Eliécer Gaitán que es prácticamente un lugar común, una frase de cajón, una verdad tan evidente que termina por volverse insubstancial. Pero, ¿alguien escuchó acaso a Bibi Aisha en Afganistán? ¿Su marido la vería como a un ser humano o como a ganado que habla? El honor del infeliz quedó "reparado" de la manera más barbárica e inhumana de que se tenga noticia. ¿El crimen? Aisha intentó abandonarlo por los maltratos y vejámenes sufridos. ¿Su actual refugio? En Occidente, en el vilipendiado Estados Unidos.
Es repugnante lo que le hicieron |
Sí, es posible coexistir, pero primero que aprendan a coexistir los más recalcitrantes.
That's more I like it! |
Those who give a sentence in a case without hearing the other side, no matter how fair is that sentence, becomes unfair because of this.An aphorism by Jorge Eliecer Gaitan that is practically a cliche, a platitude, a truth so obvious that it ends up becoming insubstantial. But, did perhaps someone heard Aisha Bibi in Afghanistan? Did her husband consider her as a human being or as talking cattle? The honor of the unfortunate was "repaired" in the most barbaric and inhumane way by using an uncivilized law to enforce punishment. Which was that crime? Aisha tried to leave her husband because of the abuse and humiliation suffered. Where lies her current shelter? In the West, in the much-maligned United States of America.
If I were her, I wish I've never made the cover of Time |
Yes, it is possible to coexist, but first the most recalcitrant ones must learn to coexist with the most tolerant ones.
Related articles
- Bibi Aisha's Tormentor Captured (thedailybeast.com)
- Bibi Aisha, victim of the Taliban's political strategy (guardian.co.uk)
- Bibi Aisha: Afghan police intervene in mutilation (sfgate.com)
- Bibi Aisha's Pain Isn't Over (thedailybeast.com)
- Arrest Made in Case of Mutilated Afghan Woman (waronterrornews.typepad.com)
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)